MadanyCo.™
All posts

Piece 809Operator

Words that cancel themselves

· 1 min read

A seller sends a message that opens with "no obligation, of course". He has no way to oblige anyone to do anything. The phrase is there anyway, and it lands as the opposite of what it says.

There are many of these. Trust me. With all due respect. Just a quick one. I promise this is worth your time. Each is meant to soften the message or add weight to it. Each, read closely, undermines it. If you have to announce that something is worth my time, I start to suspect it is not.

They are filler, the spoken habit of clearing your throat before getting to the point. They exist to perform warmth or sincerity rather than to carry it.

The reason they backfire is that people do not read a message as text alone. They read it as a whole: who sent it, when, how long it is, what it chose to put first, the tone around the words. Most of the meaning arrives through those signals rather than from the literal sentences. A short reply at midnight says something different from the same reply at noon. A discount offered with three exclamation marks says something different from the same discount stated plainly.

So the filler is not neutral. It is a signal too, and the signal it sends is nerves.

The fix is not a better phrase. It is fewer of them. Say the thing. If the price is good, state the price. If there is no obligation, simply do not imply one.

Clear writing is mostly the discipline of removing what was only there to reassure the writer.